DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RANCHI Consumer Complaint No-222/2007 Order passed on 20.06.08 Amrendra Prasad…Complainant Vs. BlazeFlash Couriers….Opposite Party In the instant case Complainant prayed for a compensation of Rs. 67,000/- towards principal amount, compensation and litigation cost from the O.P for non-delivery of an envelope, booked to Madras through the O.P’s courier service. 1. …
PGIMER, Chandigarh ordered to pay compensation in medical negligence case
The Supreme Court recently held that transfusion of wrong blood group to a patient amounted to medical negligence.The Court order arises from an appeal filed by Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh against the compensation awarded to Mr. Jaspal Singh by the State and National Commission. In the instant case, Mrs. Harjit …
LIC asked to pay Death Compensation – Consumer Dispute
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi Revision Petition No.2049 of 2000 Date of Judgement: 09-09-2008 ———————– Shri Kailash Chandra Dashora was working as a teacher in a State Government school in Jhalawar and had taken an insurance policy under salary savings scheme on 15.12.1993 for a sum of Rs.50,000/-. The insurance premium was being paid …
Kingfisher directed not to indulge in unfair trade practice
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI Consumer Complaint No. 67 of 2008 J. K. Mittal & Ors, Complainant Vs. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. & Ors., Opposite Parties Order Dt.13-08-2008 It is the case of complainant no.1, Mr. J. K. Mittal, a practising advocate at Delhi and a Member of the Supreme Court and Delhi High …
Bank penalised for deficiency in service
Vijaya Bank, Bandra Branch Vs. Mrs. Pooja G. Joshi Appeal No.801 of 2003 In the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Judgement Pronounced on 23.10.2008 Mrs. Pooja G. Joshi(Respondent) operates a Saving Bank Account with Vijaya Bank, Bandra Branch. In addition,the respondent operates two Current Accounts with the said Bank under her firms’ names. It was …
Builder directed to pay compensation for delayed flat delivery
Mrs Veena Khanna of New Delhi Vs M/s. Ansal Properties and Adharshila Towers, New Delhi Before National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi Order dated 9th July 2007 ——————————————————– Mrs. Veena Khanna(Complainant) of New Delhi had offered to purchase a flat for a total consideration of Rs.23,33,344/-from M/s. Ansal Properties and Adharshila Towers, New Delhi …
Recent Comments